CSDDD Omnibus Explained – Practical interpretation (Pharma) Scenerio -1

Case:

EU MAH → CMO (India) → API supplier (India)

Under Omnibus CSDDD:

TierEntityLegal CSDDD ExpectationPractical Pharma Reality
Tier 0EU MAH✔ Fully in scope under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence DirectiveFull QMS integration with ESG embedded into governance and oversight
Tier 1CMO✔ Direct due diligence requiredAlready audited under Good Manufacturing Practice + ESG overlay added
Tier 2API supplier⚠ Risk-triggered due diligenceTypically already qualified under GMP; ESG depth depends on risk profile
Tier 3Raw materials❌ Not routinely required (unless risk triggers)Rarely visible or assessed unless critical or high-risk input

Key takeaway

The Omnibus proposal effectively says:

“Focus on direct suppliers, and only go deeper when risk justifies it.”

BUT in pharma:

  • go deeper than the law requires
  • So the real impact is:
    • Formalising ESG within existing supplier qualification systems
    • Not building entirely new layers

Strategic implication (non-obvious but important)

  • EU MAHs remain the regulatory anchor
  • Non-EU CMOs/APIs avoid direct legal scope
  • BUT:
    • They become contractually bound
    • And subject to expanded audit scope (ESG + GMP)

Bottom line

Under the Omnibus approach:

  • Tier 1 (CMOs) → fully in scope
  • Tier 2 (API suppliers) → only if risk triggers deeper review
  • Tier 3+ → generally out of scope

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *